353
was
*
dated 11 1866
Commending it um replied to ly a letter from Lealand Lovell, Commanding Royal Engineer, laying claim to ground which considerably overlaps that along which the proposed road would go, namely up to the 300
13.
feet contour.
In this letter Colonel Lovell referred to the "letter of the 15th September 1853", and stated that the record plans now in existence were copies of that referred to in this letter, in which the boundaries were explicitly detailed; and that though
Vide
1
* Page 42. Inclosure.
it was true that the Plan did not shew the boundary quite up to the 500
feet contour, yet that that was only owing to the paper
was
the plan
was made not being quite large enough, (though I may remark by the way that it is amply large enough as a reference to it will show)
and that in all other respects the boundaries marked on the plan coincided so nicely
A.
with those detailed in the letter of the 15th September 1858, that it might be inferentially concluded that had the paper been large enough the continuation of the boundary line would still have continued to coincide with
that of the letter referred to, and indeed the method adopted for defining the upper part of the boundary by Magnetic Bearings
353
was
*
dated 11 1866
Commending it um replied to ly a letter from lealand Lovell, Commanding Royal Engineer, laying claim to ground heile page se considerably with of that along which the proposed woad would
up to the 300
13.
feet contour.
go, namely
In this letter Colonel Iwell refered to the "letter of the wit September 1853, and tated that the
record plans
and now in neistine were
copies of that referred to in this letter, in which the bandaries were
explicitly detailed; and that though
Vide
1
* Page 42. Inclone.
it was true that the Plan did not Plan Mas
shew the bandary quite up to the
500
feet contour, get that that only aving to the paper
wa.
A
the plan
was made not being quite large enough, (though I may remarks by the way that it is amply longe enough as a ceference to it wild show)
and that in all wher respedò
bundaries marked on the plan
eincided to euch
A.
nicely
the
rick chose
detailed in the letter of the 15th September 1858, that it might be inferentially concluded that hat the paper been large enough the contimation of the bundary line would
still have continued to coincide with
that of the letter referred to, and indeed the mertiod adopted for defining the upper part of the boundary by Magnetic Lasa
!
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.